OF Agency Rankings

October 2026 · rubric v1.0

Updates and changelog

Last updated

This log records every change to the rules, the agency list and the scores on OF Agency Rankings, newest first. It exists so that anyone can see when and why something changed, including anything that affects Fan Fusion, the agency operated by our publisher, Fan Fusion LLC. Corrections of our own errors are logged separately on the corrections page.

Follow along with the Atom feed, or download the same log as changes.json.

What we log here

  • New rubric versions, with a before-and-after rank table for every agency.
  • Each publication of rescored data.
  • Agencies added, removed, or removed at their own request.
  • Score changes after an agency updates its own website.
  • Changes to our disclosure, editorial policy or site terms.

Log

  1. : White Door Management added (submission), scored 9.2, rank 2.

    White Door Management was added through the submission route open to every agency, after it was submitted on 2026-10-23, and scored 9.2 (rank 2 of 31). We checked all 54 pages in its sitemap and 20 further guides linked from its site on 2026-10-23, with a second, separate pass the same day, under rubric v1.0 and the same application notes as every agency. It publishes 10 of the 12 criteria in full; What the percentage is taken from (C02) and Contract text before signing (C09) are partly published.

    Its website was rebuilt shortly before this check: an earlier version we checked on 2026-10-22, before the agency was listed, published fewer terms (4.6 under the same checklist). Its domain was registered on 2026-10-21, and its dated history is checked against that registration. The results and team figures on its site are listed on its profile as claims we did not check, with what its page source said about them on 2026-10-22.

    Fan Fusion stays at rank 1 (9.6). Every agency ranked 2 to 30 before moves down one place; no other score changed.

  2. : Fan Fusion: rechecked after its plan descriptions changed.

    Fan Fusion’s website changed on 2026-10-22, after our first recheck that day. It now says chatting only covers the whole OnlyFans account (chats, fan lists and notes, mass messages, PPV, renewals and win-backs, and the OnlyFans page itself) with the weekly report and the monthly call, that full management adds the social media marketing, and that on both plans the commission is a share of the account’s total net. We rechecked all 45 pages in its sitemap and its sample term sheet the same day (rule E8, as for every agency). No two pages conflict, and no score or rank changed (9.6, rank 1). The quote for What the percentage is taken from (C02) now matches the live sentence, and the Scope and fit (C12) text and the per-service commission notes describe the new plan scope.

  3. : How C04 and C11 are applied, and rescoring of three agencies.

    We added two application notes, on the Contract length and notice and Dated history pages and in the methodology. They explain how the frozen criterion texts are applied, the same way for every agency, Fan Fusion included. Rubric v1.0 is unchanged.

    • Contract length and notice (C04): “month to month” and “rolling” answer whether the agreement renews, and so does an agreement that runs open-ended until one side ends it (for example “no fixed term” or “an indefinite period”); wording that only describes the right to leave does not. Every month-to-month or rolling agreement now shows the same renewal value, Fan Fusion’s included.
    • Dated history (C11): only records of the agency itself count. Archive copies of a different website or a domain-for-sale page, unfinished template or default pages, and register dates we could not see ourselves, do not.

    Score and rank changes:

    • Fan Fusion: 10.0 to 9.6, rank 1 unchanged (Dated history returned from 10 to 5: the only archived page naming Fan Fusion LLC is an unfinished website template with no OnlyFans management content, so no record of the agency was found).
    • Aruna Talent: 6.7 to 7.1, rank 7 to 5 (Contract length and notice from 5 to 10: its homepage FAQ says there is no minimum term, that the partnership continues as long as both sides are winning, and that the creator leaves on 30 days’ notice).
    • Foxy Studios: rank 5 to 6 (score unchanged at 7.1).
    • Goddess Business: rank 6 to 7 (score unchanged at 6.7).
    • FONCÉ Agency: 4.6 to 5.8, rank 12 to 11 (Contract length and notice from 0 to 10 and Contract text before signing from 0 to 5: a terms table on its management page; we cannot tell whether this table was on the page at our 2026-10-20 check, as no archive copy dates it).
    • Pyros Management: rank 11 to 12 (score unchanged at 5.0).

    Under the C04 note, the renewal fact and cell wording changed without a score change for Bunny Agency, Fan Fusion, FansHub, Foxy Studios, Goddess Business, Pyros Management and TalentGrow. Fan Fusion was also rechecked against its live site on the same day; at that check its published terms had not changed (its plan descriptions changed later that day; see the Fan Fusion entry of the same date). All other ranks are unchanged.

  4. : Corrections from the same review.

    We corrected earliest-record facts, one notice period and one renewal fact. Only the Fan Fusion correction changes points. We also corrected some dates and one table: the “not found” statements for Belle Muse, Goddess Business, Magic Agency and Untouched Agency are again dated October 20, 2026, the date of each agency’s full check, with their records check of October 22 shown separately; the same records check, which changed nothing for AROA Agency, Aruna Talent, AT Agency, Bunny Agency, FONCÉ Agency, Foxy Studios, Louna's Models, Scissorzz and TalentGrow, is now shown on their profiles too; where no country was found (AT Agency, Goddess Business, TopStar MGMT), the statement is dated by the agency’s own check, not by the latest check in the dataset; and the robustness check now shows Fan Fusion’s score in each run, names any agency it ties with on score and gives the tie-break that places it (the disclosure page now states this result too, where it had only described the check). These change no score or rank. Each one is listed in the corrections log.

  5. : Fan Fusion: Dated history rescored after an About page update.

    Fan Fusion: Dated history (C11) from 5 to 10, score 9.6 to 10.0, after its About page changed on 2026-10-21 to give 2024, the year Fan Fusion LLC was founded, as its start, with team experience since 2021 under other agency names stated separately (recheck under rule E8, same as for every agency). On 2026-10-22 the cell returned to 5 (score 9.6) under the C11 application note; see the entry of that date above.

  6. : First publication.

    31 agencies published with scores under rubric v1.0, all checked on or before October 20–23, 2026. Fan Fusion, operated by our publisher, is included as a self-submission and scored by the same checklist as every other agency. Agencies not yet fully checked are listed as "check in progress", without a score or rank.

  7. : Rubric v1.0 frozen.

    The 12 criteria, the 0/5/10 point bands, the score arithmetic, the tie-break and the evidence rules E1 to E9 were fixed and published before any agency, including Fan Fusion, was scored. See the methodology and the criteria.