{
 "publisher": "Fan Fusion LLC",
 "publisher_operates_ranked_agency": true,
 "publisher_agency": "Fan Fusion",
 "disclosure": "Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria.",
 "disclosure_url": "https://ofagencyrankings.com/disclosure/",
 "inclusion_rule": "At launch, this ranking covers 30 of the 33 agencies listed on at least two of the three largest public OnlyFans agency rankings as of October 20, 2026; the other 3 meet this rule and are not covered (publisher’s decision). It also covers 2 agencies that entered through submissions, the route open to every agency: Fan Fusion, a self-submission, and White Door Management. More agencies will be added in alphabetical order.",
 "score_caveat": "Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted.",
 "site": "OF Agency Rankings",
 "site_url": "https://ofagencyrankings.com/",
 "license": "CC BY 4.0",
 "license_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
 "attribution": "OF Agency Rankings, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/data/. Rubric v1.0.",
 "attribution_note": "Please keep the publisher disclosure when you reuse this data.",
 "rubric_version": "1.0",
 "rubric_frozen": "2026-10-20",
 "data_checked": "2026-10-23",
 "data_checked_from": "2026-10-20",
 "data_checked_text": "October 20–23, 2026",
 "sample_data": false,
 "changes": [
  {
   "id": "white-door-management-2026-10-23",
   "date": "2026-10-23",
   "type": "data",
   "title": "White Door Management added (submission), scored 9.2, rank 2",
   "summary": "White Door Management was added through the submission route open to every agency, after it was submitted on 2026-10-23, and scored 9.2 (rank 2 of 31). We checked all 54 pages in its sitemap and 20 further guides linked from its site on 2026-10-23, with a second, separate pass the same day, under rubric v1.0 and the same application notes as every agency. It publishes 10 of the 12 criteria in full; What the percentage is taken from (C02) and Contract text before signing (C09) are partly published. Its website was rebuilt shortly before this check: an earlier version we checked on 2026-10-22, before the agency was listed, published fewer terms (4.6 under the same checklist). Its domain was registered on 2026-10-21, and its dated history is checked against that registration. The results and team figures on its site are listed on its profile as claims we did not check, with what its page source said about them on 2026-10-22. Fan Fusion stays at rank 1 (9.6). Every agency ranked 2 to 30 before moves down one place; no other score changed."
  },
  {
   "id": "fan-fusion-2026-10-22",
   "date": "2026-10-22",
   "type": "data",
   "title": "Fan Fusion: rechecked after its plan descriptions changed",
   "summary": "Fan Fusion's website changed on 2026-10-22, after our first recheck that day. It now says chatting only covers the whole OnlyFans account (chats, fan lists and notes, mass messages, PPV, renewals and win-backs, and the OnlyFans page itself) with the weekly report and the monthly call, that full management adds the social media marketing, and that on both plans the commission is a share of the account's total net. We rechecked all 45 pages in its sitemap and its sample term sheet the same day (rule E8, as for every agency). No two pages conflict, and no score or rank changed (9.6, rank 1). The quote for What the percentage is taken from (C02) now matches the live sentence, and the Scope and fit (C12) text and the per-service commission notes describe the new plan scope."
  },
  {
   "id": "rescoring-2026-10-22",
   "date": "2026-10-22",
   "type": "data",
   "title": "How C04 and C11 are applied, and rescoring of three agencies",
   "summary": "Two application notes were added to the criteria pages and the methodology. They explain how the frozen criterion texts are applied, the same way for every agency, Fan Fusion included; rubric v1.0 is unchanged. Contract length and notice (C04): “month to month” and “rolling” answer whether the agreement renews, and so does an agreement that runs open-ended until one side ends it (for example “no fixed term” or “an indefinite period”), while wording that only describes the right to leave does not; every month-to-month or rolling agreement now shows the same renewal value. Dated history (C11): only records of the agency itself count; archive copies of a different website or a domain-for-sale page, unfinished template or default pages, and register dates we could not see ourselves, do not. Score changes: Fan Fusion 10.0 to 9.6, rank 1 unchanged (C11 returned from 10 to 5: the only archived page naming Fan Fusion LLC is an unfinished website template with no OnlyFans management content, so no record of the agency was found); Aruna Talent 6.7 to 7.1 (C04 from 5 to 10: its homepage FAQ says there is no minimum term, that the partnership continues as long as both sides are winning, and that the creator leaves on 30 days' notice) and rank 7 to 5; Foxy Studios rank 5 to 6 and Goddess Business rank 6 to 7 (scores unchanged at 7.1 and 6.7); FONCÉ Agency 4.6 to 5.8 (C04 from 0 to 10 and C09 from 0 to 5: a terms table on its management page; we cannot tell whether this table was on the page at our 2026-10-20 check, as no archive copy dates it) and rank 12 to 11; Pyros Management rank 11 to 12 (score unchanged at 5.0). Under the C04 note, the renewal fact and cell wording changed without a score change for Bunny Agency, Fan Fusion, FansHub, Foxy Studios, Goddess Business, Pyros Management and TalentGrow. Fan Fusion was also rechecked against its live site on the same day; at that check its published terms had not changed (its plan descriptions changed later that day; see the Fan Fusion entry of the same date). Corrections made in the same review are listed on the corrections page."
  },
  {
   "id": "corrections-2026-10-22",
   "date": "2026-10-22",
   "type": "correction",
   "title": "Corrections from the October 22 consistency review",
   "summary": "Earliest-record facts corrected for Belle Muse, Creators Inc, Fan Fusion, Goddess Business, Magic Agency, Noblesse Studios, TDM Agency and Untouched Agency, so that only records of the agency itself are listed as its earliest record. Foxy Studios (C04): a guide page in its sitemap gives a different notice period, so the cell now shows both notice periods (rule E4; score unchanged). Hush Talent (C04): the renewal fact now shows both of its statements. Only the Fan Fusion correction changes points. Some dates and one table were also corrected, with no score or rank change: the not-found statements for Dated history (C11) of Belle Muse, Goddess Business, Magic Agency and Untouched Agency, and their lists of terms not found, are again dated October 20, 2026, the date of each agency's full check, with the records check of October 22, 2026 shown separately; the same records check, which changed nothing for AROA Agency, Aruna Talent, AT Agency, Bunny Agency, FONCÉ Agency, Foxy Studios, Louna's Models, Scissorzz and TalentGrow, is now shown on their profiles too; where no country was found (AT Agency, Goddess Business, TopStar MGMT), the statement is dated by the agency's own check, not by the latest check in the dataset; and the methodology robustness check now shows Fan Fusion's score in each run and names any agency it ties with on score, with the tie-break that places it; the disclosure page now states this result too, where it had only described the check. Details are in the corrections log."
  },
  {
   "id": "fan-fusion-2026-10-21",
   "date": "2026-10-21",
   "type": "data",
   "title": "Fan Fusion: Dated history rescored after an About page update",
   "summary": "Fan Fusion: Dated history (C11) from 5 to 10, score 9.6 to 10.0, after its About page changed on 2026-10-21 to give 2024, the year Fan Fusion LLC was founded, as its start, with team experience since 2021 under other agency names stated separately (recheck under rule E8, same as for every agency). On 2026-10-22 the cell returned to 5 (score 9.6) under the C11 application note; see the rescoring entry of that date."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-10-20",
   "type": "data",
   "title": "First publication: 31 agencies scored",
   "summary": "31 agencies scored on rubric v1.0, using each agency's own public pages. Fan Fusion was scored with the same checklist after the rubric was frozen. At launch, this ranking covers 30 of the 33 agencies listed on at least two of the three largest public OnlyFans agency rankings as of October 20, 2026; the other 3 meet this rule and are not covered (publisher’s decision). It also covers 2 agencies that entered through submissions, the route open to every agency: Fan Fusion, a self-submission, and White Door Management. More agencies will be added in alphabetical order.",
   "id": "change-2026-10-20-1"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-10-20",
   "type": "rubric",
   "title": "Rubric v1.0 frozen",
   "summary": "The 12 criteria, bands, evidence rules and tie-break were frozen and published before any agency was scored.",
   "id": "change-2026-10-20-2"
  }
 ]
}