# TalentGrow vs White Door Management: published terms compared, October 2026 As of October 23, 2026, TalentGrow scores 8.3/10 (#4 of 31) and White Door Management scores 9.2/10 (#2) on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (8 vs 10 of 12 criteria in full). Checked October 20–22, 2026 (TalentGrow) and October 23, 2026 (White Door Management) ## How do TalentGrow and White Door Management differ in published terms? as of October 23, 2026 - Criteria: White Door Management publishes more than TalentGrow on 3: other charges (C03, in full vs in part), payments after you leave (C05, in full vs in part) and company behind the brand (C10, in full vs in part). TalentGrow publishes more than White Door Management on 1: what the percentage is taken from (C02, in full vs in part). - Commission: TalentGrow publishes agency share by monthly earnings band 40–60% of net; White Door Management publishes full account management 25–60% of net. - No commission after you leave: White Door Management states it; TalentGrow does not state it in those words (see the key terms below). - No charges besides the commission: White Door Management states it; TalentGrow does not state it in those words (see the key terms below). - Notice to end: TalentGrow: 14 days; White Door Management: Thirty days, in writing (an email is enough), either side; no penalty for leaving. - Company named on the site: TalentGrow: none stated; White Door Management: Kasir Consulting LLC (Wyoming, United States). Where they publish the same: commission taken from net earnings; no minimum term; the creator keeps the login; payouts go to the creator; no fixed term that renews itself. ## TalentGrow and White Door Management key terms side by side as published Table: Key terms as each site states them. Facts are shown, not scored. | Term | [TalentGrow](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/talentgrow/) | [White Door Management](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/white-door-management/) | |---|---|---| | Commission | Agency share by monthly earnings band 40–60% of net | Full account management 25–60% of net | | Commission base | Net (after the platform fee) | Net (after the platform fee) | | Other charges | No upfront fee, setup cost or monthly charge; $0 exit fees; DMCA protection and social media management included at no extra charge. Tool fees, ad spend and content costs not addressed. | None: no upfront costs, no set-up fees, no other fees; 'The commission is the only charge.' Set-up, leak removal, reports and calls, software and tools, and exit fees are listed as never billed on top. | | Minimum term | None (month to month, rolling monthly) | None (no minimum term) | | Notice to end | 14 days | Thirty days, in writing (an email is enough), either side; no penalty for leaving | | Renewal / how the term continues | Month to month or rolling, ends on notice | No automatic renewal | | Payments after you leave | Not stated explicitly. After the 14-day notice the agency removes access, sends a final invoice and hands over the content schedule. | None ('No commission on anything earned after the agreement ends.') | | Account login | Account, content and login stay the creator's. Team works in the account through Infloww and logs in with the creator's password; it can see stats, post and message but cannot reach bank, payout details, email or social accounts. Creator ends access by changing the password. | Account, password, login email and two-step verification stay with the creator; the agency never asks for the password. The team works through team access the creator grants through the platform's own tools and can revoke at any time (partners page names Infloww as the team's tool). | | Where payouts land | OnlyFans pays into the creator's own bank account; the agency invoices its share after the creator has been paid. | Platform pays directly into the creator's own bank account; the agency never receives or holds payouts and invoices its commission afterwards, based on the platform's statement for the period. | | Country | United Kingdom (registered address in Manchester) | United States (Wyoming LLC with an address in Sheridan, Wyoming) | ## The 12 criteria side by side checked October 20–23, 2026 Table: TalentGrow and White Door Management side by side: score, 12 criteria and key terms as published, checked October 20–23, 2026. | Criterion | [TalentGrow](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/talentgrow/) | [White Door Management](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/white-door-management/) | |---|---|---| | Score | 8.3/10 | 9.2/10 | | Rank | #4 of 31 | #2 of 31 | | Criteria C01–C12 | **8** of 12 in full · 4 partly published, 0 not found | **10** of 12 in full · 2 partly published, 0 not found | | Band | Publishes most key terms | Publishes most key terms | | [Price on the page](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/price-on-the-page/) (C01) | Full 10/10 The site publishes its split for every earnings band of its single management service: the creator keeps 40% under $10K a month, 50% from $10K to $30K and 60% from $30K, so the agency takes 60%, 50% or 40%. Quote: “You keep 40% of what the page earns under $10K a month” | Full 10/10 White Door publishes a commission of 25–60% of net earnings. One range covers its only service, full account management; there is no separate price list per service, and the exact rate is set in the written agreement before signing. Quote: “Rate: 25–60% of net earnings. One range covers the full service” | | [What the percentage is taken from](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/commission-base/) (C02) | Full 10/10 The split is worked out on what the creator receives after OnlyFans' 20% fee and after refunds and chargebacks, and the band applies to all of the page's earnings for the month. Cam earnings are excluded. Quote: “worked out on what you receive, after OnlyFans' 20% and after refunds and chargebacks” | Partial 5/10 The base is stated: net earnings, meaning what reaches the creator after the platform's share, invoiced on the net earnings shown in the platform's own statement for the period. Which income types the commission covers (subscriptions, messages, tips, other) is not stated. Quote: “Net means the earnings that reach the creator after the platform's share” | | [Other charges](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/other-charges/) (C03) | Partial 5/10 The site says there is no upfront fee, setup cost, monthly charge or exit fee, and that DMCA protection and social media management are included at no extra charge. It does not address tool fees, ad spend or content costs, or state that there are no other charges. Quote: “There's no upfront fee, setup cost or monthly charge” | Full 10/10 The site states that there are no upfront costs, set-up fees or other fees and that the commission is the only charge. It lists set-up fees, leak removal, reports and calls, software and tools, and any exit fee, penalty or commission after the end as never billed on top. Quote: “No upfront costs, no set-up fees, no other fees. The commission is the only charge.” | | [Contract length and notice](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/term-and-notice/) (C04) | Full 10/10 Agreements run month to month with no minimum term and can be ended on 14 days' notice with no exit fee. Quote: “It's month to month with 14 days' notice, and leaving costs $0.” | Full 10/10 No minimum term; either side can end the agreement with thirty days' notice in writing (an email is enough); the site says there is no automatic renewal. Quote: “No minimum term and no automatic lock-in or renewal period.” | | [Payments after you leave](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/after-you-leave/) (C05) | Partial 5/10 The site says that when the notice period ends the agency removes its access, sends a final invoice and hands over the content schedule. It does not say whether any commission applies to income earned after the agreement ends. Quote: “Once your notice ends, we remove our access, send the final invoice and hand over” | Full 10/10 The site states that no commission is charged on anything earned after the agreement ends; commission applies only to net earnings up to the end of the agreement. Quote: “No commission on anything earned after the agreement ends” | | [Account access](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/account-access/) (C06) | Full 10/10 The creator keeps the account, login and full control and can end access by changing the password. The team works in the account through the Infloww CRM, logging in with the creator's password, with access to stats, posts and messages but not to bank or payout details, email or social media accounts. Quote: “The account, the content and the login stay yours.” | Full 10/10 The creator keeps the password, login email and two-step verification; the agency never asks for the password. The team works through team access the creator grants through the platform's own tools and can revoke at any time. Quote: “Your password, email and two-step verification stay with you. We never ask for the password.” | | [Where the money goes](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/money-flow/) (C07) | Full 10/10 OnlyFans pays earnings into the creator's own bank account, and the agency invoices its share after the creator has been paid. Quote: “We invoice our share after you've been paid, so the money always reaches you first.” | Full 10/10 Platform payouts go directly to the creator's own bank account and the agency never receives or holds them; the agency invoices its commission afterwards, based on the platform's statement for the period. Quote: “Payouts go from the platform directly to the creator's own bank account.” | | [Content rights](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/content-rights/) (C08) | Full 10/10 The site says the creator owns every piece of content during and after the agreement, and that at the end the agency removes its access and hands over the content schedule. Quote: “Ownership of every piece of content, during and after” | Full 10/10 Content belongs to the creator and is used only to run the account, in approved ways, while the agreement runs. At the end the team's access is removed, the voice guide, fan notes and price list are handed back, and the agency's copies are deleted, except records the law requires, such as invoices. Quote: “When the agreement ends, account material is handed back and our copies are deleted” | | [Contract text before signing](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/contract-before-signing/) (C09) | Partial 5/10 No sample agreement or full term sheet is published. The terms of service list key terms of the client agreement (account ownership and access, payouts and invoicing, month-to-month term, 14 days' notice, no exit fees), and other pages show a labelled 'terms, in print' table. Quote: “all management arrangements are governed by a separate written agreement. Key terms include” | Partial 5/10 The site publishes a sample term sheet as a page, with eleven numbered sections (parties, scope, commission, invoicing, term and notice, exit, ownership, confidentiality, content protection, data, individual agreement), readable without a form. It describes itself as a plain-language summary of the standard terms; the individual terms and the full agreement are sent after a first conversation. Quote: “It is a non-binding sample that summarises White Door's standard terms in plain language.” | | [Company behind the brand](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/company-behind-the-brand/) (C10) | Partial 5/10 The site says TalentGrow is a registered UK company with a registered address in Manchester, and its terms are governed by the laws of England and Wales. No legal entity name or company number is given. Quote: “UK company, registered in Manchester” | Full 10/10 The site names the operating company, Kasir Consulting LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, with an address in Sheridan, Wyoming, on the company page, the legal notice, the privacy policy, the term sheet and the footer of every page. Quote: “Kasir Consulting LLC, a limited liability company registered in Wyoming, USA” | | [Dated history](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/dated-history/) (C11) | Full 10/10 Stated start: 2025. Earliest public record found: domain registered on 27 July 2025 (Nominet whois), within 12 months of the stated start. Quote: “Running creator pages since 2025” | Full 10/10 The site states that its team has worked in OnlyFans management since 2021 and has operated as White Door Management since 2026. The earliest record of the agency we found is the registration of its domain, whitedoormgmt.com, on 2026-10-21 (registry RDAP), inside the 12-month window of the stated 2026 start. No web-archive copy exists. The formation date of Kasir Consulting LLC could not be seen (register behind human verification). Quote: “worked in OnlyFans management since 2021 and has operated as White Door Management since 2026” | | [Scope and fit](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/scope-and-fit/) (C12) | Full 10/10 The site lists what every agreement includes (dedicated strategy, 24/7 chat team, content management, traffic and growth, DMCA and privacy, weekly reporting) and states fit limits: creators must be 18 or over and treating it as a real income; the agency takes a small number of creators and takes 0% of cam earnings. Quote: “You need to be 18 or over and treating this as a real income.” | Full 10/10 The site lists what the single commission includes (24/7 inbox in the creator's voice, voice guide, pricing, growth on approved channels, daily note and weekly report, content protection, onboarding, switching and exit help, English and German) and states exclusions and fit limits: no content production, no single services such as leak removal on their own, OnlyFans and Fansly only, and no accounts that would need platform rules bent. Quote: “We manage OnlyFans and Fansly only” | Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Full evidence: [TalentGrow profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/talentgrow/) · [White Door Management profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/white-door-management/) · [All comparisons](https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/) · [All commission rates](https://ofagencyrankings.com/commission/) ## Cite this page `OF Agency Rankings: TalentGrow vs White Door Management, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/talentgrow-vs-white-door-management/. Rubric v1.0.` Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. --- Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. How we handle this: https://ofagencyrankings.com/disclosure/ About the scores: measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Source page: https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/talentgrow-vs-white-door-management/ · This page: last checked October 23, 2026 · Data checked October 20–23, 2026 · Rubric v1.0 · Data licence CC BY 4.0 · Publisher: Fan Fusion LLC, Wyoming, USA