<!-- Markdown version of https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/scissorzz-vs-white-door-management/ -->

# Scissorzz vs White Door Management: published terms compared, October 2026

As of October 23, 2026, Scissorzz scores 8.3/10 (#3 of 31) and White Door Management scores 9.2/10 (#2) on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (8 vs 10 of 12 criteria in full).

Checked October 20–22, 2026 (Scissorzz) and October 23, 2026 (White Door Management)

## How do Scissorzz and White Door Management differ in published terms?

as of October 23, 2026

- Criteria: White Door Management publishes more than Scissorzz on 2: account access (C06, in full vs in part) and dated history (C11, in full vs in part). Scissorzz publishes no criterion more fully than White Door Management.
- Commission: Scissorzz publishes management, by scope and account size 40–60% of net; White Door Management publishes full account management 25–60% of net.
- The creator keeps the login: White Door Management states it; Scissorzz does not state it in those words (see the key terms below).
- Notice to end: Scissorzz: Four weeks' written notice by either party; termination for good cause preserved; White Door Management: Thirty days, in writing (an email is enough), either side; no penalty for leaving.
- Company named on the site: Scissorzz: Scissorzz LLC (Colorado, United States); White Door Management: Kasir Consulting LLC (Wyoming, United States).

Where they publish the same: commission taken from net earnings; no minimum term; no commission after you leave; no charges besides the commission; payouts go to the creator; no fixed term that renews itself.

## Scissorzz and White Door Management key terms side by side

as published

Table: Key terms as each site states them. Facts are shown, not scored.

| Term | [Scissorzz](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/scissorzz/) | [White Door Management](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/white-door-management/) |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Management, by scope and account size 40–60% of net | Full account management 25–60% of net |
| Commission base | Net (after the platform fee) | Net (after the platform fee) |
| Other charges | None stated: no setup fee, no retainer, no payment before results; commission covers everything and 'Nothing costs extra'; no exit penalties. | None: no upfront costs, no set-up fees, no other fees; 'The commission is the only charge.' Set-up, leak removal, reports and calls, software and tools, and exit fees are listed as never billed on top. |
| Minimum term | None (no fixed term; agreement runs for an indefinite period, no minimum duration) | None (no minimum term) |
| Notice to end | Four weeks' written notice by either party; termination for good cause preserved | Thirty days, in writing (an email is enough), either side; no penalty for leaving |
| Renewal / how the term continues | No automatic renewal | No automatic renewal |
| Payments after you leave | None ('No commission on anything you earn after the agreement ends.') | None ('No commission on anything earned after the agreement ends.') |
| Account login | Creator keeps account access at all times; agency advises 2FA; team working access exists during the agreement and ends with it. How the team logs in is not described. | Account, password, login email and two-step verification stay with the creator; the agency never asks for the password. The team works through team access the creator grants through the platform's own tools and can revoke at any time (partners page names Infloww as the team's tool). |
| Where payouts land | Net earnings paid into the creator's own bank account; agency invoices its commission afterwards, payable within seven days | Platform pays directly into the creator's own bank account; the agency never receives or holds payouts and invoices its commission afterwards, based on the platform's statement for the period. |
| Country | United States (Boulder, Colorado) | United States (Wyoming LLC with an address in Sheridan, Wyoming) |

## The 12 criteria side by side

checked October 20–23, 2026

Table: Scissorzz and White Door Management side by side: score, 12 criteria and key terms as published, checked October 20–23, 2026.

| Criterion | [Scissorzz](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/scissorzz/) | [White Door Management](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/white-door-management/) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 8.3/10 | 9.2/10 |
| Rank | #3 of 31 | #2 of 31 |
| Criteria C01–C12 | **8** of 12 in full · 4 partly published, 0 not found | **10** of 12 in full · 2 partly published, 0 not found |
| Band | Publishes most key terms | Publishes most key terms |
| [Price on the page](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/price-on-the-page/) (C01) | Full 10/10 The contract-terms page gives a commission of 40-60% of net earnings, depending on the scope of services and account size, with the exact rate fixed in the contract before signing. Quote: “40–60 % of net earnings, depending on scope and account size.” | Full 10/10 White Door publishes a commission of 25–60% of net earnings. One range covers its only service, full account management; there is no separate price list per service, and the exact rate is set in the written agreement before signing. Quote: “Rate: 25–60% of net earnings. One range covers the full service” |
| [What the percentage is taken from](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/commission-base/) (C02) | Partial 5/10 The commission is taken from net earnings. The site does not list which income types (subscriptions, messages, tips, other) count. Quote: “40–60 % of net earnings” | Partial 5/10 The base is stated: net earnings, meaning what reaches the creator after the platform's share, invoiced on the net earnings shown in the platform's own statement for the period. Which income types the commission covers (subscriptions, messages, tips, other) is not stated. Quote: “Net means the earnings that reach the creator after the platform's share” |
| [Other charges](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/other-charges/) (C03) | Full 10/10 The site says there is no setup fee, no retainer and no payment before results, that the commission covers everything with nothing costing extra, and that there are no exit penalties. Quote: “None. No setup fee, no retainer, no payment before results.” | Full 10/10 The site states that there are no upfront costs, set-up fees or other fees and that the commission is the only charge. It lists set-up fees, leak removal, reports and calls, software and tools, and any exit fee, penalty or commission after the end as never billed on top. Quote: “No upfront costs, no set-up fees, no other fees. The commission is the only charge.” |
| [Contract length and notice](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/term-and-notice/) (C04) | Full 10/10 The agreement has no fixed term and no minimum duration, runs indefinitely, and either party can end it with four weeks' written notice. Quote: “No fixed term. The agreement runs for an indefinite period” | Full 10/10 No minimum term; either side can end the agreement with thirty days' notice in writing (an email is enough); the site says there is no automatic renewal. Quote: “No minimum term and no automatic lock-in or renewal period.” |
| [Payments after you leave](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/after-you-leave/) (C05) | Full 10/10 The site says no commission is charged on anything the creator earns after the agreement ends. Quote: “No commission on anything you earn after the agreement ends.” | Full 10/10 The site states that no commission is charged on anything earned after the agreement ends; commission applies only to net earnings up to the end of the agreement. Quote: “No commission on anything earned after the agreement ends” |
| [Account access](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/account-access/) (C06) | Partial 5/10 The site says the creator keeps access to the account at all times, that the agency advises 2FA, and that the team's working access lasts only while the agreement runs. It does not say who holds the password and account email or how the team logs in. Quote: “The creator keeps access to her account at all times” | Full 10/10 The creator keeps the password, login email and two-step verification; the agency never asks for the password. The team works through team access the creator grants through the platform's own tools and can revoke at any time. Quote: “Your password, email and two-step verification stay with you. We never ask for the password.” |
| [Where the money goes](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/money-flow/) (C07) | Full 10/10 Platform payouts go into the creator's own bank account, and the agency invoices its commission afterwards, payable within seven days. Quote: “Net earnings are paid into the creator's own bank account” | Full 10/10 Platform payouts go directly to the creator's own bank account and the agency never receives or holds them; the agency invoices its commission afterwards, based on the platform's statement for the period. Quote: “Payouts go from the platform directly to the creator's own bank account.” |
| [Content rights](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/content-rights/) (C08) | Full 10/10 Content stays the creator's, and the agency's right to use it ends when the agreement ends. Quote: “Stays yours. Our right to use it ends when the agreement ends.” | Full 10/10 Content belongs to the creator and is used only to run the account, in approved ways, while the agreement runs. At the end the team's access is removed, the voice guide, fan notes and price list are handed back, and the agency's copies are deleted, except records the law requires, such as invoices. Quote: “When the agreement ends, account material is handed back and our copies are deleted” |
| [Contract text before signing](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/contract-before-signing/) (C09) | Partial 5/10 The contract-terms page publishes labelled template excerpts of the main clauses (term and termination, account access, contractor status, payouts and commission) plus a table of other terms. The complete agreement is sent after applying for a growth audit. Quote: “These are template excerpts from the Scissorzz management agreement” | Partial 5/10 The site publishes a sample term sheet as a page, with eleven numbered sections (parties, scope, commission, invoicing, term and notice, exit, ownership, confidentiality, content protection, data, individual agreement), readable without a form. It describes itself as a plain-language summary of the standard terms; the individual terms and the full agreement are sent after a first conversation. Quote: “It is a non-binding sample that summarises White Door's standard terms in plain language.” |
| [Company behind the brand](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/company-behind-the-brand/) (C10) | Full 10/10 The terms of service say the site is run by Scissorzz LLC, a limited liability company registered in Colorado, USA, with a Boulder registered address. Terms are governed by Colorado law. Quote: “a limited liability company registered in Colorado, USA” | Full 10/10 The site names the operating company, Kasir Consulting LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, with an address in Sheridan, Wyoming, on the company page, the legal notice, the privacy policy, the term sheet and the footer of every page. Quote: “Kasir Consulting LLC, a limited liability company registered in Wyoming, USA” |
| [Dated history](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/dated-history/) (C11) | Partial 5/10 The site states a 2021 start. The earliest public record found is the domain registration of 2025-01-04, more than 12 months later. Quote: “Scissorzz LLC has been managing OnlyFans creators since 2021.” | Full 10/10 The site states that its team has worked in OnlyFans management since 2021 and has operated as White Door Management since 2026. The earliest record of the agency we found is the registration of its domain, whitedoormgmt.com, on 2026-10-21 (registry RDAP), inside the 12-month window of the stated 2026 start. No web-archive copy exists. The formation date of Kasir Consulting LLC could not be seen (register behind human verification). Quote: “worked in OnlyFans management since 2021 and has operated as White Door Management since 2026” |
| [Scope and fit](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/scope-and-fit/) (C12) | Full 10/10 The site says the commission covers traffic, 24/7 chatting, backend monetization, content strategy and leak protection, and that creators who are just starting out should not sign; it points them to a separate DIY programme. Quote: “Who should not sign with us: creators who are just starting out.” | Full 10/10 The site lists what the single commission includes (24/7 inbox in the creator's voice, voice guide, pricing, growth on approved channels, daily note and weekly report, content protection, onboarding, switching and exit help, English and German) and states exclusions and fit limits: no content production, no single services such as leak removal on their own, OnlyFans and Fansly only, and no accounts that would need platform rules bent. Quote: “We manage OnlyFans and Fansly only” |

Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted.

Full evidence: [Scissorzz profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/scissorzz/) · [White Door Management profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/white-door-management/) · [All comparisons](https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/) · [All commission rates](https://ofagencyrankings.com/commission/)

## Cite this page

`OF Agency Rankings: Scissorzz vs White Door Management, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/scissorzz-vs-white-door-management/. Rubric v1.0.`

Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria.

---

Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. How we handle this: https://ofagencyrankings.com/disclosure/

About the scores: measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted.

Source page: https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/scissorzz-vs-white-door-management/ · This page: last checked October 23, 2026 · Data checked October 20–23, 2026 · Rubric v1.0 · Data licence CC BY 4.0 · Publisher: Fan Fusion LLC, Wyoming, USA
