# Goddess Business vs SirenCY: published terms compared, October 2026 As of October 23, 2026, Goddess Business scores 6.7/10 (#8 of 31) and SirenCY scores 5.8/10 (#10) on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (7 vs 4 of 12 criteria in full). Checked October 20–22, 2026 (Goddess Business) and October 20, 2026 (SirenCY) ## How do Goddess Business and SirenCY differ in published terms? as of October 23, 2026 - Criteria: Goddess Business publishes more than SirenCY on 4: what the percentage is taken from (C02, in full vs in part), contract length and notice (C04, in full vs in part), account access (C06, in full vs in part) and content rights (C08, in full vs not found). SirenCY publishes more than Goddess Business on 2: price on the page (C01, in part vs not found) and company behind the brand (C10, in full vs not found). - Commission: Goddess Business publishes no rate; SirenCY publishes agency fee 35% of net. - No minimum term: SirenCY states it; Goddess Business does not state it in those words (see the key terms below). - The creator keeps the login: SirenCY states it; Goddess Business does not state it in those words (see the key terms below). - Notice to end: Goddess Business: 30 days (one month); 15-day period to fix a problem before either side can terminate; SirenCY: not stated. - Company named on the site: Goddess Business: none stated; SirenCY: QOSMIC CO PTY LTD (Australia). Where they publish the same: commission taken from net earnings; no commission after you leave; payouts go to the creator. ## Goddess Business and SirenCY key terms side by side as published Table: Key terms as each site states them. Facts are shown, not scored. | Term | [Goddess Business](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/goddess-business-agency/) | [SirenCY](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/sirency/) | |---|---|---| | Commission | No rate published: the site says the rate follows the services included (fewer services, lower rate) and that existing earnings are part of the negotiation. Commission is on net earnings after OnlyFans' share, on OnlyFans income only, invoiced weekly after the platform releases funds, plus VAT where it applies. | Agency fee 35% of net | | Commission base | Net (after the platform fee) | Net (after the platform fee) | | Other charges | Nothing fixed on top of the commission; VAT added where it applies; paid advertising, when used, is generally shared the same way as the commission. Exit fees not addressed. | Models page: no setup charges, nothing charged before the creator earns, and the fee is the only charge. Homepage: any other charges are provided in writing before an agreement. | | Minimum term | 14-day start window in which either side can stop, then 3 months, then month to month | None as standard; if a case needs one, it is written into the agreement (models page) | | Notice to end | 30 days (one month); 15-day period to fix a problem before either side can terminate | Not stated (set in each written agreement) | | Renewal / how the term continues | Month to month or rolling, ends on notice | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | | Payments after you leave | No commission after the agreement ends (cost article). The contract template still contains a 12-month non-compete, which the site says has never been invoked and is being removed. | None: the fee ends when the partnership does; nothing charged on later earnings (models page) | | Account login | Neither side changes credentials without the other; the agency says it cannot change the password; the recovery email, phone and payout stay with the creator. | Fansly and Fanvue onboarding pages: creator keeps password, two-factor authentication and login details; team works through a Fansly Management Session or Fanvue manager account the creator sets up. OnlyFans access is not described; models FAQ says credential handling is confirmed in the written agreement. | | Where payouts land | OnlyFans pays the creator directly; the agency invoices its commission weekly after the platform releases the funds. | Platform pays into the creator's own account and bank; SirenCY then invoices its fee (models page) | | Country | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Australia (Melbourne) | ## The 12 criteria side by side checked October 20–23, 2026 Table: Goddess Business and SirenCY side by side: score, 12 criteria and key terms as published, checked October 20–23, 2026. | Criterion | [Goddess Business](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/goddess-business-agency/) | [SirenCY](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/sirency/) | |---|---|---| | Score | 6.7/10 | 5.8/10 | | Rank | #8 of 31 | #10 of 31 | | Criteria C01–C12 | **7** of 12 in full · 2 partly published, 3 not found | **4** of 12 in full · 6 partly published, 2 not found | | Band | Publishes some key terms | Publishes some key terms | | [Price on the page](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/price-on-the-page/) (C01) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Partial 5/10 The site states a single 35% agency fee on the homepage, about, models, contact, apply and terms pages. A self-review blog post on the same site says commission rates are not publicly listed and require a consultation. Quote: “SirenCY charges a 35% agency fee.” | | [What the percentage is taken from](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/commission-base/) (C02) | Full 10/10 The cost article says the commission is taken from net earnings after OnlyFans' share and covers only OnlyFans income, with no share of brand deals, social media income or other monetization. Quote: “The base: net, after OnlyFans' share, and only what happens on OnlyFans.” | Partial 5/10 The homepage and models page say the 35% fee is calculated on net earnings, meaning what the platform pays the creator after its own fee. Income types (subscriptions, messages, tips, other) are not listed, and the about page says the calculation base is set in each written agreement. Quote: “It is calculated on your net earnings” | | [Other charges](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/other-charges/) (C03) | Partial 5/10 The site says there is no cost to work with the agency, that nothing fixed is added on top of the commission, that VAT is added where it applies, and that paid advertising, when used, is generally shared the same way as the commission. Exit fees are not addressed and no amounts are given for advertising. Quote: “Nothing is fixed on top of the commission.” | Partial 5/10 The models page says there are no setup charges, nothing is charged before the creator earns, and the fee is the only charge. The homepage says any other charges are provided in writing before an agreement, and a self-review blog post says other charges should be verified in the agreement. Quote: “The fee is the only number here, and it is the only charge.” | | [Contract length and notice](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/term-and-notice/) (C04) | Full 10/10 The agency's contract has a 14-day start window in which either side can stop, then a 3-month initial term, then continues month to month with 30 days' notice. It also has a 15-day period to fix a problem before either side can terminate. Quote: “then three months, then month to month with thirty days' notice” | Partial 5/10 The models page says there is no minimum term as standard and any minimum is written into the agreement. The notice period and automatic renewal are not stated; the about page says the agreement sets how long it runs and the notice either side gives. Quote: “None as standard. If your case needs one, it is written in your agreement” | | [Payments after you leave](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/after-you-leave/) (C05) | Full 10/10 The site states that the agency takes no commission on anything earned after the agreement ends. Quote: “After you leave: no commission at all.” | Full 10/10 The models page says the fee ends when the partnership ends and nothing is charged on what the creator earns afterwards. Quote: “The fee ends when the partnership does. Nothing is charged on what you earn afterwards.” | | [Account access](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/account-access/) (C06) | Full 10/10 The site says the account's recovery email, phone and payout belong to the creator, that the agency works with the account credentials but cannot change the password on its side, and that neither side changes credentials without the other. Quote: “We ask that neither side changes credentials without the other.” | Partial 5/10 For Fansly and Fanvue, the site's onboarding steps say the creator keeps the password, two-factor authentication and login details, and the team works through a Fansly Management Session or Fanvue manager account the creator sets up. For OnlyFans, the main offer, credentials and team access are not described; the models page FAQ says these are confirmed in the written agreement. Quote: “You create the Management Sessions, keep your password and two-factor authentication” | | [Where the money goes](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/money-flow/) (C07) | Full 10/10 Platform payouts go directly to the creator, and the agency invoices its commission weekly after the platform has released the funds, correcting reversed amounts on the next invoice. Quote: “The platform: we don't touch it. OnlyFans pays you directly.” | Full 10/10 The models page says platform payouts go into the creator's own account and bank, and SirenCY then invoices its fee. Quote: “The platform pays into your own account and bank; SirenCY then invoices its fee.” | | [Content rights](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/content-rights/) (C08) | Full 10/10 The site says what the creator makes stays theirs, the agency's licence on the creator's images runs only while they work together, and material featuring the creator is deleted when the agreement ends. Quote: “when it ends we delete the material that features you” | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | | [Contract text before signing](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/contract-before-signing/) (C09) | Partial 5/10 No sample agreement or full term sheet is published; the contract is signed after a call. Blog posts publish labelled summaries of the agency's own contract terms (licence, credentials, non-compete, term, notice, trial window, invoicing, content deletion, commission base and post-exit commission). Quote: “The same five questions, asked of us” | Partial 5/10 No sample agreement or full term sheet is published. The models page has a labelled table of standard terms: fee, calculation basis, payout route, setup charges, post-exit fee and minimum term. Quote: “The terms below are the standard ones; your agreement is the final word.” | | [Company behind the brand](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/company-behind-the-brand/) (C10) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Full 10/10 The terms of service name QOSMIC CO PTY LTD (ABN 28 667 365 479), trading as SirenCY and under the registered business name X SIREN MEDIA. The about page says it is an Australian private company; the terms are governed by Victorian law. Quote: “operated by QOSMIC CO PTY LTD (ABN 28 667 365 479), trading as SirenCY” | | [Dated history](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/dated-history/) (C11) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | | [Scope and fit](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/scope-and-fit/) (C12) | Full 10/10 The site says what the OnlyFans work covers (promotion, chatting, managing the feed and subscribers, support with content) and that the rate depends on which of three service levels is chosen. It excludes brand deals, social media income and other monetization from the commission and asks creators to work 2 to 3 hours a day. Quote: “We take no share of what you earn elsewhere” | Full 10/10 The homepage says SirenCY provides content planning, fan chatting workflows, monetization strategy and operations, with exact scope set per creator, and lists who is probably not a fit, such as creators wanting overnight results without collaboration. Quote: “Creators looking for overnight results without collaboration.” | Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Full evidence: [Goddess Business profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/goddess-business-agency/) · [SirenCY profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/sirency/) · [All comparisons](https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/) · [All commission rates](https://ofagencyrankings.com/commission/) ## Cite this page `OF Agency Rankings: Goddess Business vs SirenCY, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/goddess-business-agency-vs-sirency/. Rubric v1.0.` Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. --- Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. How we handle this: https://ofagencyrankings.com/disclosure/ About the scores: measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Source page: https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/goddess-business-agency-vs-sirency/ · This page: last checked October 22, 2026 · Data checked October 20–23, 2026 · Rubric v1.0 · Data licence CC BY 4.0 · Publisher: Fan Fusion LLC, Wyoming, USA