# Aruna Talent vs TalentGrow: published terms compared, October 2026 As of October 23, 2026, Aruna Talent scores 7.1/10 (#6 of 31) and TalentGrow scores 8.3/10 (#4) on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (6 vs 8 of 12 criteria in full). Checked October 20–22, 2026 (Aruna Talent) and October 20–22, 2026 (TalentGrow) ## How do Aruna Talent and TalentGrow differ in published terms? as of October 23, 2026 - Criteria: TalentGrow publishes more than Aruna Talent on 5: price on the page (C01, in full vs not found), what the percentage is taken from (C02, in full vs in part), where the money goes (C07, in full vs in part), content rights (C08, in full vs in part) and dated history (C11, in full vs in part). Aruna Talent publishes more than TalentGrow on 3: other charges (C03, in full vs in part), payments after you leave (C05, in full vs in part) and company behind the brand (C10, in full vs in part). - Commission: Aruna Talent publishes no rate; TalentGrow publishes agency share by monthly earnings band 40–60% of net. - No commission after you leave: Aruna Talent states it; TalentGrow does not state it in those words (see the key terms below). - No charges besides the commission: Aruna Talent states it; TalentGrow does not state it in those words (see the key terms below). - Notice to end: Aruna Talent: 30 days' written notice; TalentGrow: 14 days. - Company named on the site: Aruna Talent: Aruna Talent LLC (Wyoming, United States); TalentGrow: none stated. Where they publish the same: commission taken from net earnings; no minimum term; the creator keeps the login; payouts go to the creator; no fixed term that renews itself. ## Aruna Talent and TalentGrow key terms side by side as published Table: Key terms as each site states them. Facts are shown, not scored. | Term | [Aruna Talent](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aruna-talent/) | [TalentGrow](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/talentgrow/) | |---|---|---| | Commission | Not published. The site says its share is calculated on net, after the platform's 20% fee, and that the exact split is laid out on the discovery call. | Agency share by monthly earnings band 40–60% of net | | Commission base | Net (after the platform fee) | Net (after the platform fee) | | Other charges | None stated: no upfront cost, no setup fees, no monthly retainer or bill, nothing on top of the share, no exit fee; mentors included, not a paid add-on | No upfront fee, setup cost or monthly charge; $0 exit fees; DMCA protection and social media management included at no extra charge. Tool fees, ad spend and content costs not addressed. | | Minimum term | None (no minimum term) | None (month to month, rolling monthly) | | Notice to end | 30 days' written notice | 14 days | | Renewal / how the term continues | No automatic renewal | Month to month or rolling, ends on notice | | Payments after you leave | None (no commission after the creator leaves) | Not stated explicitly. After the 14-day notice the agency removes access, sends a final invoice and hands over the content schedule. | | Account login | Creator keeps the login; a blog post says the written agreement sets team access through platform-native features with no primary credentials | Account, content and login stay the creator's. Team works in the account through Infloww and logs in with the creator's password; it can see stats, post and message but cannot reach bank, payout details, email or social accounts. Creator ends access by changing the password. | | Where payouts land | Homepage: OnlyFans pays the creator directly and payouts stay in her name. Referral FAQ: payouts are processed weekly or bi-weekly by bank transfer or PayPal. How the agency's share is collected is not stated. | OnlyFans pays into the creator's own bank account; the agency invoices its share after the creator has been paid. | | Country | United States (LLC registered in Wyoming per the about page) | United Kingdom (registered address in Manchester) | ## The 12 criteria side by side checked October 20–23, 2026 Table: Aruna Talent and TalentGrow side by side: score, 12 criteria and key terms as published, checked October 20–23, 2026. | Criterion | [Aruna Talent](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aruna-talent/) | [TalentGrow](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/talentgrow/) | |---|---|---| | Score | 7.1/10 | 8.3/10 | | Rank | #6 of 31 | #4 of 31 | | Criteria C01–C12 | **6** of 12 in full · 5 partly published, 1 not found | **8** of 12 in full · 4 partly published, 0 not found | | Band | Publishes some key terms | Publishes most key terms | | [Price on the page](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/price-on-the-page/) (C01) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Full 10/10 The site publishes its split for every earnings band of its single management service: the creator keeps 40% under $10K a month, 50% from $10K to $30K and 60% from $30K, so the agency takes 60%, 50% or 40%. Quote: “You keep 40% of what the page earns under $10K a month” | | [What the percentage is taken from](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/commission-base/) (C02) | Partial 5/10 The homepage says the agency's share is calculated on net earnings, after the platform's 20% fee. It does not say which income types (subscriptions, messages/PPV, tips, other) the share applies to. Quote: “Our share is calculated on net, after the platform's 20% fee” | Full 10/10 The split is worked out on what the creator receives after OnlyFans' 20% fee and after refunds and chargebacks, and the band applies to all of the page's earnings for the month. Cam earnings are excluded. Quote: “worked out on what you receive, after OnlyFans' 20% and after refunds and chargebacks” | | [Other charges](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/other-charges/) (C03) | Full 10/10 The site says there is no upfront cost, no setup fee, no monthly retainer or bill and no exit fee, and that nothing is charged on top of the revenue share; mentors are included rather than a paid add-on. Quote: “We charge nothing upfront and nothing on top” | Partial 5/10 The site says there is no upfront fee, setup cost, monthly charge or exit fee, and that DMCA protection and social media management are included at no extra charge. It does not address tool fees, ad spend or content costs, or state that there are no other charges. Quote: “There's no upfront fee, setup cost or monthly charge” | | [Contract length and notice](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/term-and-notice/) (C04) | Full 10/10 The homepage FAQ, answering "How long is the contract?", says there is no minimum term, that the partnership continues as long as both sides are winning, and that the creator leaves on 30 days' notice with no exit fee. The guide on its own no-contract approach repeats no minimum term and 30 days' written notice. Quote: “Our partnership continues as long as we’re both winning.” | Full 10/10 Agreements run month to month with no minimum term and can be ended on 14 days' notice with no exit fee. Quote: “It's month to month with 14 days' notice, and leaving costs $0.” | | [Payments after you leave](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/after-you-leave/) (C05) | Full 10/10 The homepage FAQ says no commission is charged after the creator leaves. Quote: “and there is no commission after you leave” | Partial 5/10 The site says that when the notice period ends the agency removes its access, sends a final invoice and hands over the content schedule. It does not say whether any commission applies to income earned after the agreement ends. Quote: “Once your notice ends, we remove our access, send the final invoice and hand over” | | [Account access](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/account-access/) (C06) | Full 10/10 The homepage says the creator keeps her login. A blog post says the written agreement covers team access through platform-native features, without the primary credentials. Quote: “team access provisions (platform-native features, no primary credentials)” | Full 10/10 The creator keeps the account, login and full control and can end access by changing the password. The team works in the account through the Infloww CRM, logging in with the creator's password, with access to stats, posts and messages but not to bank or payout details, email or social media accounts. Quote: “The account, the content and the login stay yours.” | | [Where the money goes](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/money-flow/) (C07) | Partial 5/10 The homepage says OnlyFans pays the creator directly and payouts stay in her name, while the referral FAQ says payouts are processed weekly or bi-weekly by bank transfer or PayPal (E4). How the agency collects its share is not stated. Quote: “You keep your login, OnlyFans pays you directly” | Full 10/10 OnlyFans pays earnings into the creator's own bank account, and the agency invoices its share after the creator has been paid. Quote: “We invoice our share after you've been paid, so the money always reaches you first.” | | [Content rights](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/content-rights/) (C08) | Partial 5/10 The terms say creators keep ownership of their original content, and a blog post says the agreement states 100% creator ownership. What happens to the agency's copies and access at the end is not stated. Quote: “Creators retain ownership of their original content.” | Full 10/10 The site says the creator owns every piece of content during and after the agreement, and that at the end the agency removes its access and hands over the content schedule. Quote: “Ownership of every piece of content, during and after” | | [Contract text before signing](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/contract-before-signing/) (C09) | Partial 5/10 No sample agreement or full term sheet is published. A blog section on the agency's own agreement lists what is agreed in writing: commission base, service scope, 30-day notice, content ownership and team access. Quote: “Aruna Talent’s agreement has no minimum term, 30 days’ written notice and no exit fee.” | Partial 5/10 No sample agreement or full term sheet is published. The terms of service list key terms of the client agreement (account ownership and access, payouts and invoicing, month-to-month term, 14 days' notice, no exit fees), and other pages show a labelled 'terms, in print' table. Quote: “all management arrangements are governed by a separate written agreement. Key terms include” | | [Company behind the brand](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/company-behind-the-brand/) (C10) | Full 10/10 The about page names Aruna Talent LLC and says it is registered in Wyoming, United States. The footer also names Aruna Talent LLC, and the terms are governed by Wyoming law. Quote: “Aruna Talent LLC was founded in 2022 and is registered in Wyoming, United States.” | Partial 5/10 The site says TalentGrow is a registered UK company with a registered address in Manchester, and its terms are governed by the laws of England and Wales. No legal entity name or company number is given. Quote: “UK company, registered in Manchester” | | [Dated history](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/dated-history/) (C11) | Partial 5/10 The site says the agency was founded in 2022. The earliest public record of the agency found is the domain registration on 2024-12-11, more than 12 months later. Quote: “Aruna Talent was founded in 2022 after watching talented creators sign with agencies” | Full 10/10 Stated start: 2025. Earliest public record found: domain registered on 27 July 2025 (Nominet whois), within 12 months of the stated start. Quote: “Running creator pages since 2025” | | [Scope and fit](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/scope-and-fit/) (C12) | Full 10/10 The site says the share includes the dedicated team, strategy and full operations (24/7 messaging, content strategy, social media, retention, DMCA monitoring, identity protection). It lists who is not a fit, such as creators wanting fast results without consistent work or not comfortable with adult content. Quote: “You want fast results without consistent execution” | Full 10/10 The site lists what every agreement includes (dedicated strategy, 24/7 chat team, content management, traffic and growth, DMCA and privacy, weekly reporting) and states fit limits: creators must be 18 or over and treating it as a real income; the agency takes a small number of creators and takes 0% of cam earnings. Quote: “You need to be 18 or over and treating this as a real income.” | Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Full evidence: [Aruna Talent profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aruna-talent/) · [TalentGrow profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/talentgrow/) · [All comparisons](https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/) · [All commission rates](https://ofagencyrankings.com/commission/) ## Cite this page `OF Agency Rankings: Aruna Talent vs TalentGrow, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/aruna-talent-vs-talentgrow/. Rubric v1.0.` Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. --- Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. How we handle this: https://ofagencyrankings.com/disclosure/ About the scores: measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Source page: https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/aruna-talent-vs-talentgrow/ · This page: last checked October 22, 2026 · Data checked October 20–23, 2026 · Rubric v1.0 · Data licence CC BY 4.0 · Publisher: Fan Fusion LLC, Wyoming, USA